Explaining the Reference of the International Community and Global Society for Protests in the International System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.12.I.3.11

Keywords:

Global Society, international community, activists, justice, order, responsibiliyt

Abstract

Today, the interactions and common values ​​of the members of the international community influence the goals and procedures of other members. All actors or members of the society may not be satisfied with the system of dominance or governance of values; on this basis, they have tried to protest against what is. This research has been compiled with the aim of distinguishing between the values ​​of the world community and the international community as sources of reaching the dissatisfaction of - governmental and non-governmental activsts. Activists have used the tools of the international community and the world community to express their wishes. The main question here is what is the fundamental and objective difference between the international community and the global community conceptually as a reference for dissatisfied activists? The current research method has been done in a comparative way and with library tools, articles from valuable scientific journals. The findings of the research have shown that: non-governmental actors have preferably addressed the international community in order to be able to influence government policies; because the global community has played a role as well as global public opinion. Disssatisfied government activists are getting closer to their political goals by addressing the international community, and gaining the satisfaction and attention of the members of the international community is far more beneficial for governments than the international community.

Author Biography

Alireza Ansary Kargar, Jami University

Faculty of Law and Political Science, Jami University, Herat, Afghanistan

References

جکسون، رابرت؛ سورنسون، گئوریک. (1390). ‌درآمدی بر روابط بین‌الملل‌. ترجمۀ مهدی ذاکریان، احمد تقی‌زاده و حسن سعید کلاهی. چ سوم. تهران: نشر میزان.

چگنی‌زاده، غلامعلی؛ پورآخوندی، نادر. (1393). «جامعه‌پذیری دولت در نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل». ایران: مجلۀ مطالعات راه‌بردی. ‌‌3 (پیاپی 65). صص: 136 – 170. .https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17350727.1393.17.65.5.6

روسو، ژان ژاک. (1390). ‌قرارداد اجتماعی‌. ترجمۀ سعید حبیبی. تهران: ابر سفید.

عسگرخانی، ابومحمد. (1395). ‌رژیم‌های بین‌المللی‌. تهران: خرسندی.

عبداله‌خانی، عبدالله. (1392). ‌نظریه‌های امنیت‌. چ دوم. تهران: مؤسسۀ فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر تهران.

قنبری، سمیه. (1398). «مفهوم جامعۀ بین‌الملل و تلاش برای پیوند میان حقوق بین‌الملل و روابط بین‌الملل». ایران: مجلۀ مطالعات بین‌المللی. 1 (پ 61). صص: 30 – 71. https://doi.org/10.22034/isj.2019.93074.

قوام، عبدالعلی. (1389). اصول سیاست خارجی و سیاست بین‌الملل‌. چ شانزدهم. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانش‌گاه‌ها (سمت)، مرکز تحقیق و توسعۀ علوم انسانی.

کونگ، هانس. (1389). «‌اخلاق جهانی به‌مثابۀ بنیانی برای جامعۀ جهانی». ترجمۀ سید‌حسین شرف‌الدین. ایران: مجلۀ معرف اخلاقی.‌ 2(1). ‌صص: 146 – 115. http://marefateakhlagi.nashriyat.ir/node/49.

گریفتس، مارتین، روچ، استیون، سولومون، اسکات. (1396). ‌پنجاه متفکر بزرگ روابط بین‌الملل‌. ترجمۀ علیرضا طیب. چ چهارم. تهران: نشر نی.

لینکلیتر، آندره. (1387). ‌صلح لیبرالی‌. ترجمۀ علیرضا طیب. چ دوم. تهران: وزارت امور خارجه. مرکز چاپ و انتشارات.

مشیرزاده، حمیرا. (1393). ‌تحول در نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل‌. چ نهم. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانش‌گاه‌ها (سمت). مرکز تحقیق و توسعۀ علوم انسانی.

والتز، کنت. (1398). ‌انسان، دولت و جنگ ‌تحلیل نظری‌. ترجمۀ محمدرضا رستمی. تهران: نشر ثالث.

References

Jackson, Robert and George Sorenson. (2011). introduction to International Relations. Translation by: M Zakerian, A. Taghizadeh and H.S.Kolahi, Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (Persian).

Cheginizadah, Gholamali; Poorakhondi, Nader. (2014). "Stare Socialization in International Theories". Iran: Journal of Stratigic Studies, Volume: 17 Issue:3, pp 135 – 170. .https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17350727.1393.17.65.5.6.

Rousseau, Jean Jacques. (2011). the Social Contract. Translation by: Saeed Habibi. Tehran: Abra Safid Publisher. (Persian).

Asgar Khani, Abomohammad. (2016). International Regimes. Tehran: Khorsandi Publisher. (Persian).

Abdollahkhani, Ali. (2013). Security Theories. second printing, Tehran: Tehran International Studies& Research Institute. (Persian)

Ghanbari, Somaye. (2019). "The Concept of International Society and Attempet to Link International Law and International Relations". Iran: International Studies Journal, Volume:16. Issue: 1. Pp 7 – 30.

Ghavam, Abdol – Ali. (2012). Principle of Foreign policy and International Politics. The sixteenth printing, Tehran: SAMT. (Persian)

Kong, Hans. (2010). "Global ethics as a foundation for the global community". Translated by: Sayyid Husayn Sharaf-ud-Din. Iran: Marrifat – i Akhlaqi, vol.2.No.1, pp 115 – 146 <http://marefateakhlagi.nashriyat.ir/node/49>.

Griffiths, Martin. Roach, Steven. Solomon, M. Scott. (2017). Fifty key Thinkers in International Relations. Translated by: Alireza Tayyeb, fourth printing, Tehran: Nashr – e Ney. (Persian).

Linklater, Andrew. (2008). The Liberal Peace. Translated by: Alireza Tayyeb, second printing, Tehran: Institute for Political and International Studies.

Moshirzadeh, Homeria. (2014). Development in International Relations Theories. ninth printing, Tehran: SAMT.

Waltz, Keneeth. (2019). Men, the state and War. a theorical Analysis. Transtated by: Mohammad Reza Rostami. Tehran: Sales Publication.

Published

2023-09-22

How to Cite

Ansary Kargar ع. (2023). Explaining the Reference of the International Community and Global Society for Protests in the International System. Ghalib Journal, 12(3), ۱۶۵-۱۸۱. https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.12.I.3.11