The Approach of the United States of America and the European Union to the Process of Nuclearization of the Middle East Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.12.I.4.4

Keywords:

Nuclearization, , Nuclear Deterrence, Middle East, Neoclassical Realism, America, European Union

Abstract

Considering the advantages of nuclear energy in the world, today most countries are trying to achieve it. Nuclear energy, like a double-edged sword, has two completely different uses. On the one hand, it leads to prosperity and development of a country, and on the other hand, it can be used as a weapon of war, which has caused international concerns about its use. America and Europe, because of their political and economic influence in global issues, consider themselves the two important and influential players in the world whose role in the global arrangements and equations is very high.  On the other hand, the politics of these two regions regarding the nuclearization of the Middle East countries are different from each other due to the difference in attitudes and influences, so there it is proper to make a scientific analysis of this issue. The issue that makes the necessity and importance of the current research clearer is the comparative study of the approaches of America and Europe in the face of the nuclearization of these countries in the sensitive and turbulent region of the Middle East. The main goal of this research is to study and understand the approaches of America and Europe towards the nuclearization of the Middle East countries, and it answered the main question, what is the approach of America and Europe to the process of nuclearization of the Middle East countries (2001-2021)? In the hypothesis, we will also say that America's approach in the time frame (2001-2021) is to prevent the nuclearization of the central countries of the Middle East and maintain Israel's nuclear superiority, and Europe's approach is to manage the crisis in the nuclear activities in the region. This research is based on explanatory-comparative method and the method of collecting data and information is library based. The findings of the research show that the approach of America and Europe towards the nuclear program of the Middle East countries is different for various reasons. While America is focused on defending Israel's security, Europe is looking for diplomatic solutions to solve regional problems.

Author Biographies

Seyed Hassan Mirfakhraei(Ph.D), Allameh Tabataba'i University

Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Hamid Hemmat, Allameh Tabataba'i University

Doctoral student, International Relations Department, School of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

References

احتشامی، انوشیروان. (04/ 11/ 1385). «خاورمیانه و استراتیژی‌های امنیتی امریکا و اتحادیۀ اروپا». برداشت: (11/ 04/ 1402). قابل دست‌رس در: http://jamejamonline.ir/online/669584785019119679

احمد خان بیگی، سمانه. (1392). «تأثیر سیاست امریکا و اروپا در قبال بحران سوریه بر اختلافات فراآتلانتیک». ایران: فصل‌نامۀ سیاست خارجی. ‌‌27(4).

اسدی، علی اکبر. (1389). «رئالیسم و رویکردهای رقیب به سیاست خارجی». ایران: مجلۀ راهبرد، 19(56 (بخش ویژۀ بررسی‌های سیاست خارجی)). صص223-252. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89137/fa

افشردی، محمدحسین؛ مدنی، سیدمصطفی. (1388). «ساختار نظام قدرت منطقه‌ای در خاورمیانه (با تأکید بر کشورهای برتر منطقه)». ایران: مجلۀ ‌برنام‌ ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی). 13(3 (پیاپی 62)). صص‌113-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/485005/fa

امیری، مهدی. (1384). «ارزیابی مقایسه‌ای مواضع و دیدگاه‌هاي اتحادیۀ اروپا و امریکا دربارۀ موضوعات مهم جهانی». ایران: مجلۀ مجلس و پژوهش. ‌12(پ48). صص125-190.

پرتیز، فولکر. (1387). خاورمیانه؛ موضوعی کلیدی برای گفت‌وگوی امریکا و اروپا. ترجمۀ خدیجه حیدری. به اهتمام: غلامرضا خسروي. تهران: پژوهش‌کدۀ مطالعات راهبردی.

پوراحمدی میبدی، حسین. (1389). «همگرایی و واگرایی در روابط اتحادیه اروپا-امریکا: موضوعات و زمینه‌ها». ایران: مجلۀ روابط خارجی. 2(5). 41-81. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/166888/fa

حاجی یوسفی, امیر محمد. (1386). «سیاست خارجی خاورمیانه‌ای آمریکا: منطق جهانی‌شدن یا ژئوپلیتیک؟». ایران: فصل‌نامۀ بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک. 3(8). صص88-63. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1386.3.8.3.0

حافظ‌نیا، محمد رضا. (1385). «بررسی وضعیت جغرافیای سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیک در ایران». ایران: ‌فصل‌نامۀ علوم سیاسی. 8(2). magiran.com/p371664

دهشيار، حسين. (1388). سياست خارجی امريكا واقع‌گرايی ليبرال. تهران: نشر خط سوم.

دهشیار، حسین. (1389). درک متفاوت اروپائیان از امریکا. تهران: پژوهش‌کدۀ مطالعات استراتیژیک خاورمیانه.

دوئرتی، جیمز؛ فالتزگراف، رابرت. (1388). ‌نظریه‌های متعارض در روابط بین‌الملل‌. ترجمۀ وحید بزرگی و علی رضا طیب. چ3. تهران: نشر قومس.

صادقی، حسین. (1386). طرح خاورمیانۀ بزرگ. تهران: نشر میزان.

غریب‌زاده، محمد جواد. (1388). مقایسۀ سیاست‌هاي اروپا و امریکا در خاورمیانه. قابل دست‌رس در: http://internationalrealation.persianblog.ir/post/3

قالیباف، محمدباقر؛ پورموسی، سیدموسی. (1387). «ژئوپولیتیک نوین خاورمیانه و سیاست خارجی ایران». ایران: پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. ‌66().

واعظی، محمود. (1387). «اروپا و مسألۀ امنیت در خاورمیانه». ایران: فصل‌نامۀ راهبرد. ‌41.SID. https://sid.ir/paper/474535/fa).

Glassner. Martin Ira (1993), Political Geography, New York: John wiley& sons, Inc.

Hinnebusch, Reymond and Ehteshami, Anoushiravan,(2002), The Foreign Policies of Middle East States, Colorado and London, Lynne Rinner publisher.

Mearshiemer, John. (2001), the Tragedy of Great Power Polities, New York: North Company.

Rose, Gideon (1998), Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, Word Politics, 51 (1).

Tal Dror (june 2014), Always The Bridesmaid? The EU Role In The Middle East Pease Proces, Atkin Foundation.

Taliaferro, Jeffrey, Steven Lobell and Norrin Pipsman (2009), Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy, in Lobell et al.

References

Ehtashami, Anoushirvan. (04/11/1385). "The Middle East and the security strategies of the United States and the European Union". Collection: (11/04/1402). Available at: http://jamejamonline.ir/online/669584785019119679(in Persian)

Ahmad Khan Begi, Samaneh. (2012). "The impact of American and European policy towards the Syrian crisis on transatlantic disputes". Iran: Foreign Policy Quarterly. 27(4). (in Persian)

Asadi, Ali Akbar. (1389). "Realism and Competing Approaches to Foreign Policy". Iran: Strategy Magazine, 19(56 (special section of foreign policy reviews)). pp. 223-252. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89137/fa(in Persian)

Afshardi, Mohammad Hossein; Madani, Seyed Mustafa. (1388). "The structure of the regional power system in the Middle East (with emphasis on the top countries of the region)". Iran: Space Planning and Design Magazine (Humanities Teacher). 13(3 (62 consecutive)). pp. 113-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/485005/fa(in Persian)

Amiri, Mehdi. (1384). "Comparative evaluation of the positions and views of the European Union and the United States on important global issues". Iran: Majles and Research Magazine. 12 (P48). pp. 125-190. (in Persian)

Pertiz, Folker. (1387). Middle East; A key issue for the dialogue between America and Europe. Translated by Khadija Heydari. To the attention of: Gholamreza Khosravi. Tehran: Research Code of Strategic Studies. (in Persian)

Pourahmadi Meibodi, Hossein. (1389). "Convergence and Divergence in EU-US Relations: Issues and Contexts". Iran: Journal of Foreign Relations. 2(5). 41-81. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/166888/fa(in Persian)

Haji Yousefi, Amir Mohammad. (1386). "US foreign policy in the Middle East: logic of globalization or geopolitics?". Iran: International Journal of Geopolitics. 3(8). pp. 63-88. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1386.3.8.3.0(in Persian)

Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza. (1385). "Investigating the situation of political geography and geopolitics in Iran". Iran: Political Science Quarterly. 8(2). magiran.com/p371664(in Persian)

Deshyar, Hossein. (1388). American foreign policy is liberal realism. Tehran: Khat Som Publishing. (in Persian)

Deshyar, Hossein. (1389). Europeans' different understanding of America. Tehran: Research Code of Middle East Strategic Studies. (in Persian)

Doherty, James; Faltzgraf, Robert. (1388). Conflicting theories in international relations. Translated by Vahid Zaguri and Ali Reza Tayyeb. Ch3. Tehran: Qoms Publishing. (in Persian)

Sadeghi, Hossein. (1386). Great Middle East Plan. Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)

Gharibzadeh, Mohammad Javad. (1388). Comparison of European and American policies in the Middle East. Available at: http://internationalrealation.persianblog.ir/post/3(in Persian)

Ghalibaf, Mohammad Bagher; Purmusi, Sidmusi. (1387). "New geopolitics of the Middle East and Iran's foreign policy". Iran: human geography researches. 66 ().

Vaezi, Mahmoud. (1387). "Europe and the issue of security in the Middle East". Iran: Strategy Quarterly. 41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/474535/fa). (in Persian)

Glassner. Martin Ira (1993), Political Geography, New York: John wiley& sons, Inc.

Hinnebusch, Reymond and Ehteshami, Anoushiravan,(2002), The Foreign Policies of Middle East States, Colorado and London, Lynne Rinner publisher.

Mearshiemer, John. (2001), the Tragedy of Great Power Polities, New York: North Company.

Rose, Gideon (1998), Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, Word Politics, 51 (1).

Tal Dror (june 2014), Always The Bridesmaid? The EU Role In The Middle East Pease Proces, Atkin Foundation.

Taliaferro, Jeffrey, Steven Lobell and Norrin Pipsman (2009), Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy, in Lobell et al.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Mirfakhraei س., & Hemmat ح. (2023). The Approach of the United States of America and the European Union to the Process of Nuclearization of the Middle East Countries. Ghalib Journal, 12(4), ۵۹-۷۹. https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.12.I.4.4