Coercion (Ikrah) in Prohibited Acts in Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Implications for Legal and Criminal Responsibility

Main Article Content

Atiqullah Rahmani
Sohrab Nabiltowheedi
احمد وحید صالح

Abstract

Background and Objective: Coercion (Ikrah) is considered one of the significant issues in Islamic jurisprudence, as it has wide-ranging implications for religious rulings as well as legal and criminal responsibility. This study examines coercion in relation to prohibited acts in Islamic jurisprudence and its implications within the contemporary legal context of Afghanistan. It analyzes the conditions under which coercion is established, its impact on legal and religious accountability, and its distinction from situations of necessity.


Method: This study employs a library-based research method with an analytical and comparative approach. The data for this research were collected through a review of authoritative sources in Islamic jurisprudence, including the works of jurists from the four Sunni schools of law, classical Hanafi jurisprudential texts, and selected contemporary legal references.


Findings/ Result: The findings indicate that Islamic jurists have established specific criteria for determining the validity of coercion, and depending on its nature and severity, different legal and criminal consequences may follow for the coerced person.


Conclusion: The study further demonstrates that the juristic discussions on coercion can contribute to clarifying the theoretical foundations of legal responsibility and evaluating the validity of individuals’ actions within contemporary legal systems.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Atiqullah Rahmani, Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Culture, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Culture, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Sohrab Nabiltowheedi, Assistant Professor, Department of Usul al-Fiqh, Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Studies, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan

Assistant Professor, Department of Usul al-Fiqh, Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Studies, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan

احمد وحید صالح, Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

References

The Holy Qur’an. [In Arabic]

Ibn Mājah, Muḥammad ibn Yazīd al-Qazwīnī. (1988). Sunan Ibn Mājah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. [In Arabic]

Atāsī, Aḥmad Khālid. (n.d.). Sharḥ Majallat al-Aḥkām al-ʿAdliyya. n.p.: n.n. [In Arabic]

Akhsīkathī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar Ḥusām al-Dīn. (2005). Al-Muntakhab al-Ḥusāmī. Beirut: Dār al-Madār al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]

Al-Bayhaqī, Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusayn. (2004). Al-Sunan al-Kubrā. Mecca: Dār al-Bāz. [In Arabic]

Al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh. (1990). Al-Mustadrak ʿalā al-Ṣaḥīḥayn. Edited by Muṣṭafā ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]

Al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. (1996). Al-Mufradāt fī Gharīb al-Qurʾān. Edited by Ṣafwān ʿAdnān Dāwūdī. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam. [In Arabic]

Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah ibn Muṣṭafā. (2006). Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhu. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr. [In Arabic]

Zaydān, ʿAbd al-Karīm. (2007). Al-Wajīz fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Muʾassasat Qurṭuba. [In Arabic]

Al-Saffārīnī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. (1993). Ghidhāʾ al-Albāb fī Sharḥ Manẓūmat al-Ādāb. Beirut: Muʾassasat Qurṭuba. [In Arabic]

Sarbāzī, Muḥammad ʿUmar. (2004). Fatāwā-yi Manbaʿ al-ʿUlūm Kūh Wan. Tehran: Maktabat Quds.

Saḥnūn, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān (narrated from Ibn al-Qāsim). (1988). Al-Mudawwana al-Kubrā li Mālik ibn Anas. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]

Al-Sanhūrī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq. (1954). Maṣādir al-Ḥaqq fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

Al-Shaybānī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan. (1989). Al-Mabsūṭ. Kuwait: Maktabat al-Ḥaramayn al-Sharīfayn. [In Arabic]

Shaykh Niẓām and a group of Indian scholars. (1990). Al-Fatāwā al-ʿĀlamgīriyya. Kuwait: Maktabat Rashīdiyya. [In Arabic]

Al-Ṣanʿānī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq. (1983). Al-Muṣannaf. Edited by Ḥabīb al-Raḥmān al-Aʿẓamī. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]

Ṭarābulusī, Muḥammad Kāmil. (1895). Al-Fatāwā al-Kāmila. Kuwait: Maktabat Quds. [In Arabic]

Fahīmī, Ḥakīm. (2021). “A Study of the Foundations of Coercion in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Laws of Iran and Afghanistan.” Legal Discourse Journal (Jāmiʿat al-Muṣṭafā al-ʿĀlamiyya), No. 20. Qom, Iran.

Mālik ibn Anas. (1988). Al-Mudawwana al-Kubrā (Narration of Saḥnūn from Ibn al-Qāsim). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]

Al-Marghīnānī, Burhān al-Dīn Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Abī Bakr ibn ʿAbd al-Jalīl. (1982). Al-Hidāya fī Sharḥ Bidāyat al-Mubtadī. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

Al-Nasāʾī, Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aḥmad ibn Shuʿayb al-Nasāʾī. (2018). Sunan al-Nasāʾī al-Mujtabā. Edited by Muḥammad Riḍwān ʿIrqasusī. Damascus: Dār al-Risāla al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]