The Structure of Nullity of Contracts in the Afghan Legal System: An Analysis of the Concept, Degrees, and Legal Effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.15.I.2.4Keywords:
Afghan Law, Contractual Nullity, Degrees of Nullity, Irregularity of Contract, Structure of Nullity, UnenforceabilityAbstract
Background: Nullity of contract is one of the important institutions of contract law within the Afghan legal system, playing a fundamental role in determining the validity of legal acts and the legal consequences of defective contracts. Despite its significance, the structure of contractual nullity and its degrees have received relatively limited independent and systematic scholarly attention. This study aims to elucidate the structure of contractual nullity, analyze its degrees, and examine the legal effects of a void contract within the Afghan legal system.
Method: This study adopts a descriptive-analytical method based on library research. Data were collected from authoritative jurisprudential and legal sources, particularly Majalla al-Ahkam al-Adliyya and the works of legal scholars, and were analyzed with a focus on the concept of nullity, its degrees, and the legal effects of a void contract.
Results:The findings indicate that contractual nullity in the Afghan legal system has a distinct structure, and that the nature of the defect affecting a contract plays a significant role in determining the extent of its invalidity and its legal consequences. In principle, a void contract does not produce the primary effects of a valid contract; however, in certain circumstances, it may give rise to incidental legal consequences, including liability and compensation for damages. Likewise, subsequent ratification does not cure a void contract, while severance of the contract may be considered where the valid and void parts are legally separable. In this context, distinguishing nullity from irregularity and unenforceability is essential for determining the scope of nullity and the legal status of the contract.
Conclusion: Contractual nullity in the Afghan legal system constitutes a legal institution with a defined structure and specific legal effects. Its proper analysis requires attention to the internal logic of this legal system and a clear distinction between nullity and related legal statuses. Understanding this structure can help prevent conceptual conflation and erroneous interpretations of the legal effects of defective contracts.
References
Ali Dawud, Ahmad Muhammad. (2011). Rulings on Contracts in Islamic Jurisprudence and Civil Law. Beirut: Dar al-Thaqafah for Publishing and Distribution. [Arabic]
Abdullah, Nizam al-Din. (2024). Commentary on the Civil Code, Vol. 2: Rights and Obligations. Kabul: Saeed Publications. [Persian]
Al-Kasani, Imam ‘Ala’ al-Din Abu Bakr ibn Mas‘ud. (2000). Bada’i‘ al-Sana’i‘ fi Tartib al-Shara’i‘. 3rd ed., Vol. 6. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. [Arabic]
Al-Marghinani, Burhan al-Din Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Abi Bakr ibn ‘Abd al-Jalil. (1936). Al-Hidayah: Commentary on Bidayat al-Mubtadi. Cairo: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi and Sons Press. [Arabic]
Al-Sanhuri, ‘Abd al-Razzaq Ahmad. (1998). Sources of Rights in Islamic Jurisprudence. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [Arabic]
Al-Zayla‘i, ‘Uthman ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhjan al-Bara‘i. (n.d.). Tabyin al-Haqa’iq: Commentary on Kanz al-Daqa’iq. Vol. 6. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [Arabic]
Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. (1997). Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Proofs. Vols. 5–6, 4th ed. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr. [Arabic]
Amid, Hasan. (1983). Amid Persian Dictionary. 18th ed. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. [Persian]
Baz, Rustam Pasha. (1986). Commentary on the Majalla al-Ahkam al-‘Adliyyah. Beirut: Al-Matba‘ah al-Adabiyyah. [Arabic]
Egyptian Civil Code. Enacted in 1948. [Arabic]
German Civil Code (BGB). Enacted in 1900. [German]
Ibn al-Humam, Kamal al-Din Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahid al-Hanafi. (1984). Sharh Fath al-Qadir. Vol. 6. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. [Arabic]
Ibn Nujaym, Zayn al-Din ibn Ibrahim ibn Muhammad. (1997). Al-Bahr al-Ra’iq: Commentary on Kanz al-Daqa’iq. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Arabic]
Katouzian, Nasser. (2004). Civil Law: General Principles of Contracts. 6th ed., Vol. 1. Tehran: Enteshar Joint Stock Company, in cooperation with Bahman Barna. [Persian]
Khaliqyar, Bashir Ahmad. (2012). General Principles of Contracts and Agreements. Kabul: Saeed Publications. [Persian]
Mahmassani, Subhi. (1979). Obligations and Contracts in Comparison with Modern Laws. Translated by Jamal al-Din Mahallati. Vols. 1–2. Tehran: Aban Publications. [Persian]
Mohammadi, Esmatullah. (2021). Rights and Obligations 1. Herat: Quds Publications. [Persian]
Nizam, Shaykh, and a Group of Jurists. (1991). Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyyah according to the School of Imam Abu Hanifah. 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [Arabic]
Shahidi, Mahdi. (2007). Civil Law: Formation of Contracts and Obligations. 6th ed., Vol. 1. Tehran: Majd Publications. [Persian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khlil Ahmad Fazl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
