An Examination of the Foundations, Criteria, and Functions of Hypothetical Jurisprudence in the Hanafi School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.14.I.4.3Keywords:
Contemporary Fiqh, Hanafi School, Hypothetical Jurisprudence, Ijtihād, Juristic FoundationsAbstract
Background and Objective: In the face of rapid social, medical, economic, and technological transformations, Islamic jurisprudence requires systematic mechanisms to respond to emerging issues. One of the most significant of these mechanisms within the Hanafi school is hypothetical (presumptive) jurisprudence. By relying on rational hypothesis-making within the framework of Sharīʿa principles, this approach enables the derivation of legal rulings prior to the actual occurrence of issues. Accordingly, the present article aims to examine the usūlī foundations, elucidate the governing criteria, and analyze the functions of Hanafi hypothetical jurisprudence in addressing newly emerging legal questions.
Method: This study adopts a descriptive–analytical method based on library-based sources.
Findings: The findings indicate that hypothetical jurisprudence in the Hanafi school, grounded in analogy (qiyās), juristic preference (istiḥsān), and the objectives of Sharīʿa (maqāṣid al-sharīʿa), is governed by systematic and rational criteria. It not only does not conflict with applied (real-case) jurisprudence but also complements it by contributing to the dynamism of fiqh. This approach strengthens the faculty of ijtihād, enhances juristic preparedness in confronting unprecedented issues (nawāzil), and increases the capacity of Islamic jurisprudence to adapt to temporal transformations.
Conclusion: Hanafi hypothetical jurisprudence, as a bridge between revealed texts and changing realities, occupies a significant position in the dynamism and forward-looking nature of Islamic law. The conscious revitalization of this capacity—through the reconstruction of its theoretical foundations, adherence to Sharīʿa-based criteria, and the expansion of its contemporary applications—can play an effective role in advancing contemporary fiqh and in providing systematic responses to modern challenges.
References
The Holy Qur’an. [In Arabic]
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. (2003). Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār Sharḥ Tanwīr al-Abṣār. Saudi Arabia: Dār ʿĀlam al-Kutub. [In Arabic]
Ibn al-ʿArabī, al-Qāḍī Muḥammad b. ʿAbd Allāh Abū Bakr. (2003). Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya. (1991). Iʿlām al-Muwaqqiʿīn ʿan Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Salām Ibrāhīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
Ibn Kathīr, ʿImād al-Dīn Abū al-Fidāʾ al-Dimashqī. (1993). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām. [In Arabic]
Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān b. al-Ashʿath al-Sijistānī. (1999). Sunan Abī Dāwūd. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām. [In Arabic]
Abū Zahra, Muḥammad. (1947). Abū Ḥanīfa: His Life, His Era, His Opinions and Jurisprudence. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
al-Ḥājj, ʿAbdū Khalīl. (2019). Virtual Jurisprudence: Foundations, Regulations, Tools, and Applied Models. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Fiqh and Law, Beirut, Lebanon. [In Arabic]
al-Sayyārī, Badrīya bt. Ṣāliḥ. (2017). Hypothetical Issues and Their Impact on Contemporary Cases in Acts of Worship and Family Law. Riyadh: Dār Kunūz. [In Arabic]
Bādpā, ʿUbayd Allāh. (2011). Virtual Fiqh and Real Fiqh. Zahedan: Nedā-ye Eslām Quarterly, No. 46 (Summer). [In Persian]
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad b. Ismāʿīl. (2000). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām. [In Arabic]
al-Baghdādī, al-Khaṭīb. (2004). Tārīkh Baghdād. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Baghawī, Muḥyī al-Sunna Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥusayn b. Masʿūd. (1983). Sharḥ al-Sunna. Damascus: al-Maktab al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
al-Bayḍāwī, Qāḍī ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar. (2006). Minhāj al-Wuṣūl ilā ʿIlm al-Uṣūl. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla. [In Arabic]
al-Tuwayjirī, Ḥamūd b. ʿAbd Allāh. (2009). Condemning Recklessness in Issuing Fatwas and Altering Legal Rulings. Amman: Dār al-Ḥasan. [In Arabic]
al-Jawharī, Ismāʿīl b. Ḥammād. (1965). al-Ṣiḥāḥ: Crown of the Arabic Language. Edited by Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Ghafūr ʿAṭṭār. Cairo: Dār al-ʿIlm. [In Arabic]
al-Ḥijjāwī, Abū al-Najāʾ Mūsā. (n.d.). al-Iqnāʿ fī Fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal. Edited by ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Subkī. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. [In Arabic]
al-Ḥijwī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan. (1996). al-Fikr al-Sāmī fī Tārīkh al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Ḥimyarī, Nashwān b. Saʿīd. (1999). Shams al-ʿUlūm wa-Dawāʾ Kalām al-ʿArab. Edited by Ḥusayn al-ʿUmayrī et al. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir. [In Arabic]
Ibn Rajab al-Ḥanbalī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Aḥmad. (1988). Jāmiʿ al-ʿUlūm wa-l-Ḥikam. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. [In Arabic]
Khallūq, Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn. (2013). Virtual Jurisprudence and Its Applications to Contemporary Issues. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm. [In Arabic]
al-Dāraquṭnī, ʿAlī b. ʿUmar b. Aḥmad. (2004). Sunan al-Dāraquṭnī. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla. [In Arabic]
al-Zabīdī, Abū al-Fayḍ Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. (2001). Tāj al-ʿArūs min Jawāhir al-Qāmūs. Edited by ʿAbd al-Karīm al-ʿAzbāwī. Kuwait: Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences. [In Arabic]
al-Zuḥaylī, Wahba. (1997). Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Evidences. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
Zaydān, ʿAbd al-Karīm. (2001). An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Law. Cairo: Dār ʿUmar b. al-Khaṭṭāb. [In Arabic]
al-Subkī, Taqī al-Dīn Abū al-Ḥasan. (1995). al-Ibhāj fī Sharḥ al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. (1993). al-Mabsūṭ. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. [In Arabic]
al-Shāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm b. Mūsā. (1996). al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharīʿa. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa. [In Arabic]
Shaʿbān, Zakī al-Dīn. (1968). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Shawkānī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. (1994). Fatḥ al-Qadīr. Damascus: Dār Ibn Kathīr. [In Arabic]
ʿUmar, Aḥmad Mukhtār. (2008). Dictionary of Contemporary Arabic Language. Cairo: ʿĀlam al-Kutub. [In Arabic]
al-Qaḥṭānī, Saʿīd b. Mutʿib. (2013). “Virtual Fiqh: Its Reality and Legal Ruling.” Journal of the Saudi Fiqh Association, No. 16, Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University. [In Arabic]
Qaradāghī, ʿAlī. (2005). Jurisprudence of Contemporary Medical Issues. Beirut: Dār al-Bashāʾir al-Islāmiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Kāsānī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Abū Bakr b. Masʿūd al-Ḥanafī. (1986). Badāʾiʿ al-Ṣanāʾiʿ fī Tartīb al-Sharāʾiʿ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [In Arabic]
al-Kubaysī, ʿUmar Shākir. (2014). “Evaluative Fiqh and Its Relation to Contemporary Issues.” Journal of Islamic Sciences, No. 9, University of Iraq. [In Arabic]
Karīm, Ṣāliḥ ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz. (2032). Cloning: Technology, Benefits, and Risks. Paper presented to the 10th Session of the Islamic Fiqh Academy; published in Journal of the Islamic Fiqh Academy, No. 10, Jeddah. [In Arabic]
Mālikī, Ḍāwiya & Lūnīs, Fāṭima. (2020). Virtual Jurisprudence in the Mālikī School: Theory and Practice. Master’s thesis, Ahmed Draya University, Adrar, Algeria. [In Arabic]
International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (1988). Resolutions and Recommendations of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy: Fourth Session. Jeddah: Organization of Islamic Cooperation. [In Arabic]
Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs (eds.). (2006). Kuwaiti Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence. Kuwait: Dār al-Salāsil. [In Arabic]
Muslim, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim b. al-Ḥajjāj al-Qushayrī. (2000). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām. [In Arabic]
al-Nuʿaymī, Muḥammad ʿAlī Aḥmad. (2014). Virtual Jurisprudence in the Shāfiʿī School. PhD dissertation, International Islamic Sciences University, Amman. [In Arabic]
Namla, ʿAbd al-Karīm b. ʿAlī. (1999). al-Muhadhdhab fī ʿIlm Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rushd. [In Arabic]
Nihād, ʿUmar. (2006). Virtual Jurisprudence in the School of Abū Ḥanīfa. Master’s thesis, Imam al-Aʿẓam Abū Ḥanīfa College, Mosul, Baghdad. [In Arabic]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 عبدالناصر امینی
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
