Women’s Rights to Annulment and Judicial Separation of Marriage under Afghanistan’s Principles on Marital Separation: An Approach to Preventing Family Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.15.I.2.3Keywords:
Family Disputes, Faskh of Marriage, Hanafi Jurisprudence, Principles of Separation between Spouses, Tafriq of Marriage, Women’s RightsAbstract
Background and Objective: In Islam, the family is one of the most fundamental social institutions, and the marital relationship is essentially founded on continuity, affection, mercy, and mutual respect for rights. However, in some circumstances, the continuation of marital life, due to the existence of certain Sharia-based and legal grounds, may become a source of harm, uncertainty, hostility, and family disputes. This study aims to examine women’s right to "Faskh" (annulment) and "Tafriq" (judicial separation) of marriage in light of Afghanistan’s "Principles of Separation between Spouses", and to clarify its role in preventing family disputes. Method: In terms of purpose, this study is applied, while methodologically, it adopts a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through library-based research. The provisions of Afghanistan’s "Principles of Separation between Spouses" and its jurisprudential sources were examined, with particular emphasis on the principles of Hanafi jurisprudence. The circumstances in which women may exercise the rights of "Faskh", "Tafriq", "Khulʿ" (divorce by mutual agreement), and recourse to the court were analyzed. Findings: The findings indicate that, based on Hanafi jurisprudence, Afghanistan’s "Principles of Separation between Spouses" provide women with avenues for "Faskh", "Tafriq", consensual separation, or recourse to the court in cases such as stipulated lack of "Kafāʾa" (marital compatibility), the option of puberty, misconduct by the guardian, the husband’s disappearance, specific defects of the husband, "Khulʿ", and the husband’s persistent misconduct. These rights are not absolute; rather, they depend on the existence of a valid legal ground, judicial proof, and, in many cases, a court judgment. The "Principles" also restrict the scope of judicial separation in certain cases, such as an absent but not missing husband and failure to provide maintenance. Conclusion: Women’s right to "Faskh" and "Tafriq" of marriage under Afghanistan’s "Principles of Separation between Spouses", if properly implemented, can contribute effectively to preventing family disputes by providing a Sharia-based and judicial avenue for dissolving harmful marriages, resolving uncertainty, preventing arbitrary decisions, and bringing family conflicts within the framework of the court. The full realization of this role requires legal awareness among women and families, confidential and fair proceedings, and the development of clear procedural guidelines.References
The Holy Qur’an. [Arabic]
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn ibn ʿUmar. (2000). Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār (Ibn ʿĀbidīn’s Gloss). Damascus: Dār al-Thaqāfa wa al-Turāth. [Arabic]
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram. (n.d.). Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. [Arabic]
Ibn al-Humām, Kamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wāḥid. (2003). Fatḥ al-Qadīr: Commentary on al-Hidāya, Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [Arabic]
Aḥmadī, Zahrā. (2020). “An Examination of the Cases of Annulment of Marriage in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Positive Laws of Afghanistan.” Islamic Law Research Journal, 1(1), 41–63. [Persian]
Official Gazette Directorate, Ministry of Justice. (2026). Regulation on the Separation of Spouses in Afghanistan. Official Gazette, Serial No. 1489, 8 April 2026 / 21 Shawwāl 1447 AH. Kabul: Ministry of Justice of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. [Persian]
Burhānpūrī, Shaykh Niẓām, and a Group of Indian Scholars. (2000). al-Fatāwā al-Hindiyya fī Madhhab al-Imām al-Aʿẓam Abī Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [Arabic]
Ḥusaynī, Sayyid Amrullāh. (2022). “A Reconsideration of the Grounds for Annulment of Marriage and an Examination of the View that Its Cases Are Exclusively Defined from the Perspective of the Family Jurisprudence System.” Research Journal of Social Jurisprudence, 10(2), 307–328. [Persian]
al-Zuḥaylī, Wahba. (1985). Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Evidence. 2nd ed. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr. [Arabic]
Ṣādiqī, Muḥammad. (2013). “Defects Constituting Grounds for Annulment of Marriage in the Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī Schools.” Jurisprudential and Philosophical Studies, 4(15), 87–106. [Persian]
ʿUthmānī al-Tahānawī, Ẓafar Aḥmad. (1997). Iʿlāʾ al-Sunan. Edited and annotated by Muḥammad Taqī ʿUthmānī. Karachi: Idārat al-Qurʾān wa al-ʿUlūm al-Islāmiyya. [Arabic]
ʿĪdān, Hayāʾ Muḥammad. (2025). “Kafāʾa (Compatibility) in Marriage in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Saudi Personal Status Law.” Umm al-Qura University Journal of Sharia Sciences and Islamic Studies, No. 100. Available at: https://uqu.edu.sa/jill/153346 [Arabic]
al-Fayyūmī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. (n.d.). al-Miṣbāḥ al-Munīr fī Gharīb al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr. Edited by Dr. ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm al-Shanāwī. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿārif. [Arabic]
al-Qudūrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. (2022). Mukhtaṣar al-Qudūrī. Karachi: Maktabat al-Bushrā. [Arabic]
al-Kāsānī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Abū Bakr ibn Masʿūd. (2005). Badāʾiʿ al-Ṣanāʾiʿ fī Tartīb al-Sharāʾiʿ. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth. [Arabic]
Kāẓim, Ḥaydar Ḥusayn. (2025). “Separation Due to Material and Moral Harm Suffered by One of the Spouses: A Legal Study in Comparison with Islamic Jurisprudence.” University of Kufa: Kufa Studies Center Journal, Vol. 1, No. 35. Available at: https://journal.uokufa.edu.iq/index.php/ksc/article/view/4690/4319 [Arabic]
Arabic Language Academy. (2004). al-Muʿjam al-Wasīṭ. 4th ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Shurūq al-Dawliyya. [Arabic]
al-Marghīnānī, Burhān al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Abī Bakr. (2011). al-Hidāya: Commentary on Bidāyat al-Mubtadī. Karachi: Maktabat al-Bushrā. [Arabic]
al-Mawṣilī, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Maḥmūd ibn Mawdūd. (2025). al-Ikhtiyār li-Taʿlīl al-Mukhtār. Edited by Abū Lubāba Shāh Manṣūr. Damascus: Dār al-Rawḍa. [Arabic]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 عبدالناصر امینی, عتیقالله رحمانی, بسم الله موحد

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









